Ali v. Synchrony Bank

Filing 7

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Case should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Abide by this Court's Orders signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/3/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HUSSEIN OSMAN ALI,

12
13
14

No. 1:17-cv-00488-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff,
v.
SYNCHRONY BANK,

15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO ABIDE BY THIS COURT’S ORDERS

Defendant.

16
17
18

On April 13, 2017, the parties filed a notice of settlement in this case. (Doc. No. 5.)

19

Thereafter, this court ordered the parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this

20

action in its entirety, no later than May 30, 2017. (Doc. No. 6.) To date, no such dismissal papers

21

have been filed. Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, the

22

parties are directed to (1) file appropriate dismissal papers, or (2) file a written response stating

23

why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to abide by the court’s

24

order. If no response is received, the court will dismiss this action.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

August 3, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1