Ali v. Synchrony Bank
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Case should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Abide by this Court's Orders signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/3/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HUSSEIN OSMAN ALI,
12
13
14
No. 1:17-cv-00488-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
SYNCHRONY BANK,
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO ABIDE BY THIS COURT’S ORDERS
Defendant.
16
17
18
On April 13, 2017, the parties filed a notice of settlement in this case. (Doc. No. 5.)
19
Thereafter, this court ordered the parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this
20
action in its entirety, no later than May 30, 2017. (Doc. No. 6.) To date, no such dismissal papers
21
have been filed. Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, the
22
parties are directed to (1) file appropriate dismissal papers, or (2) file a written response stating
23
why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to abide by the court’s
24
order. If no response is received, the court will dismiss this action.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
August 3, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?