Ali v. Synchrony Bank

Filing 7

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Case should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Abide by this Court's Orders signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/3/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUSSEIN OSMAN ALI, 12 13 14 No. 1:17-cv-00488-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. SYNCHRONY BANK, 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THIS COURT’S ORDERS Defendant. 16 17 18 On April 13, 2017, the parties filed a notice of settlement in this case. (Doc. No. 5.) 19 Thereafter, this court ordered the parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this 20 action in its entirety, no later than May 30, 2017. (Doc. No. 6.) To date, no such dismissal papers 21 have been filed. Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, the 22 parties are directed to (1) file appropriate dismissal papers, or (2) file a written response stating 23 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to abide by the court’s 24 order. If no response is received, the court will dismiss this action. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: August 3, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?