Camara v. Bargain Bunch

Filing 7

ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER (ECF NO. 6 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/8/2017. (Lafata, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LICIA CAMARA,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

v.
BARGAIN BUNCH

Case No. 1:17-cv-00490-LJO-MJS
ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE ANSWER
(ECF NO. 6)

Defendant.

15
16
17
18

On June 5, 2017, a motion for extension of time to file an answer was filed on

19

behalf of Defendant Bargain Bunch. The motion was submitted by “Bargain Bunch, pro

20

se.” It is signed by an unidentified individual and the signature is illegible.

21

Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any motion must

22

be signed by “at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name--or by a party

23

personally if the party is unrepresented.” Here, it is unclear who submitted the motion on

24

behalf of Bargain Bunch, that person’s relationship to Bargain Bunch, that person’s

25

authority to appear in court on behalf of Bargain Bunch, and whether Bargain Bunch

26

may be permitted to appear without an attorney in this action. Compare Rowland v. Cal.

27

Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201–202 (1993) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1654 does not

28

1

allow corporations, partnerships, or associations to appear in federal court other than

2

through a licensed attorney), and Licht v. Am. W. Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir.

3

1994) (“Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court

4

through an attorney.”), with National Independent Theatre Exhibitors, Inc. v. Buena Vista

5

Distribution Co., 748 F.2d 602, 609–10 (11th Cir. 1984) (noting that pursuant to 28

6

U.S.C. § 1654, a sole proprietor could appear in federal court pro se). Absent some

7

indication that the motion was filed by an attorney or an individual with authority to

8

proceed pro se on behalf of Bargain Bunch is this action, the motion must be denied.

9

Accordingly, the motion is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 8, 2017

/s/

13

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2