Acosta v. Gomez et al

Filing 13

ORDER TO CONTINUE Scheduling Conference from 6/27/2017 to 8/31/2017 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling Report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/22/2017. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5

Zachary M. Best. SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
Jose Acosta

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE ACOSTA ,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.
ADRIANA GABRIELA GOMEZ dba
ZAMORA CARNITAS MEXICAN
RESTAURANT, et al.

14
15
16

Defendants.
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:17-cv-00493-AWI-SAB
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; ORDER

19
20

Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, hereby

21

requests a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently scheduled in this

22

matter for June 27, 2017 at 9:45 a.m. for the reasons set forth below.

23

1.

No defendants have appeared in this action.

24

2.

Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on June 6, 2016 (Dkt. 8), and

25

served the First Amended Complaint on defendants Adriana Gabriela Gomez dba Zamora

26

Carnitas Mexican Restaurant, Humberto Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas Mexican Restaurant,

27

Edmundo Sanchez, and Rosalia Soledad Rodriguez Ruiz, by mail on June 6, 2017 pursuant

28

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, as set forth on the proofs of service on file with the

Page 1

1

Court (Dkt. 9 and 10). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), said defendants’

2

responsive pleadings are due on June 23, 2017.

3
4

3.

Sosa with the summons and First Amended Complaint.

5
6

Plaintiff is diligently attempting to serve newly named defendant Enrique

4.

As the defendants have not yet appeared, Plaintiff has not had the opportunity

to meet and confer with them to prepare the required joint scheduling report.

7

For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Mandatory

8

Scheduling Conference currently set for June 27, 2017 be continued to a date after August

9

27, 2017 at the Court’s convenience.

10
11

Dated: June 20, 2017

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

12
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jose Acosta

13
14
15
16

ORDER

17

Upon request by Plaintiff and good cause appearing,

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set

19

for June 27, 2017 be continued to August 31, 2017, at 3:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge

20

Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9 of the above-entitled Court.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 22, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

Page 2