Acosta v. Gomez et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER for further extension of time for defendants' responsive pleadings and to continue the Scheduling Conference from 8/31/2017 to 11/14/2017 at 03:45 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties are to file a joint scheduling report no later then seven days prior to the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/22/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jose Acosta
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JOSE ACOSTA ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
ADRIANA GABRIELA GOMEZ dba
ZAMORA CARNITAS MEXICAN
RESTAURANT, et al.
14
15
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
No. 1:17-cv-00493-AWI-SAB
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE
PLEADINGS AND FOR FURTHER
CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER
20
21
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Adriana Gabriela
23
Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas Mexican Restaurant, Humberto Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas
24
Mexican Restaurant (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), previously
25
entered into a stipulation granting Defendants to and including August 10, 2017 to file
26
responsive pleadings in this matter (Dkt. 18);
27
28
WHEREAS, Defendants Edmundo Sanchez and Rosalia Soledad Rodriguez Ruiz were
dismissed from the matter on July 14, 2017 (Dkt. 15);
Page 1
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff previously requested, and the Court granted, a continuance of the
2
Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter such that the Mandatory Scheduling
3
Conference is now set for August 31, 2017 (Dkt. 13);
4
WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and are hopeful that a
5
settlement can be reached informally, and desire to conserve attorney’s fees which would be
6
incurred in filing the responsive pleading while they exhaust settlement efforts, and to conserve
7
Court resources;
8
WHEREAS, despite diligent efforts, Plaintiff has yet to effect service of the summons
9
and First Amended Complaint on Defendant Enrique Sosa, which service must be effected by
10
September 1, 2017 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If Plaintiff cannot effect service by that
11
date he will take alternative action, such as requesting additional time and/or leave to effect
12
service by publication.
13
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to
14
a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for August 31, 2017 to a
15
date at the Court’s convenience on or after October 31, 2017. The Parties additionally stipulate
16
to a further extension of time for Defendants’ responsive pleadings, such that the responsive
17
pleadings be filed on or before October 13, 2017.
18
19
Dated: August 21, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Jose Acosta
20
21
22
23
Dated: August 21, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF TOMÁS NÚÑEZ
24
/s/ Tómas Núñez
Tómas Núñez
Attorney for Defendants
Adriana Gabriela Gomez dba Zamora
Carnitas Mexican Restaurant and Humberto
Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas Mexican
Restaurant
25
26
27
28
Page 2
ORDER
1
2
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which Defendants, Adriana Gabriela
4
Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas Mexican Restaurant and Humberto Gomez dba Zamora Carnitas
5
Mexican Restaurant, must file their responsive pleadings is extended to and including October
6
13, 2017. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for August 31, 2017 is continued
7
to November 14, 2017 at 3:45 p.m. in Courtroom 9, before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.
8
The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the
9
conference.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 22, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?