Bryant v. Garcia et al

Filing 11

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Close the Case re 10 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/7/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

RACHEL BRYANT,

10
11
12

Plaintiff

Case No. 1:17-cv-00503-LJO-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 10)
ROSALINDA GARCIA, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On August 4, 2017, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant filed a notice of dismissal dismissing his case

16

with prejudice. (ECF No. 10.) No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary

17

judgment. In light of Plaintiff’s notice, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

18

41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been

19

dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the

20

defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing

21

a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

22

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 7, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1