Darden v. Mechael et al
Filing
19
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Docket and Notification, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/16/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GERALDINE DARDEN,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
PHILIPE MECHAEL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:17-cv-00505-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR DOCKET AND NOTIFICATION
[ECF No. 18]
Plaintiff Geraldine Darden is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 16, 2017, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve Defendants H.
20
Longia, Philipe Mechael, Robert Mitchell, and Ikwinder Singh, and the deadline for service has not
21
yet expired.
22
On January 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion regarding the status of this case. Plaintiff is
23
advised that in cases involving a plaintiff proceeding in forma paupers, a United States Marshal, upon
24
order of the court, serves the summons and complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). The United States
25
Marshal is presently in the process of attempting to serve the above-identified defendants, and no
26
action is presently required by Plaintiff. As Plaintiff was advised in the Court’s First Informational
27
Order, filed April 11, 2017, “[a]s long as a party keeps the Court information of the party’s current
28
address, the Court will provide notice of all actions which might affect the case as soon as an action is
1
1
taken in the case. The Court will not respond in writing to individual inquiries regarding the status of
2
a case.” (ECF No. 3, Order at 3:27-4:2.)
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
January 16, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?