Millner v. Dileo et al

Filing 65

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File Response to Plaintiff's 64 Motion to Stay Action; Seven Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/13/2019. (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES W. MILLNER, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. DR. DILEO, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:17-cv-00507-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY ACTION (ECF No. 64) SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff James W. Millner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants DiLeo, Ulit, and 19 Spaeth, in their individual capacity, for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in 20 violation of the Eighth Amendment, based on Plaintiff’s wrist injury. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay action, filed on October 21, 2019. 22 (ECF No. 64.) In his motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court stay this action and extend the 23 December 2, 2019 dispositive motion deadline for 28 weeks because he has developed dementia 24 and is currently undergoing assessment and treatment at California Health Care Facility and 25 because he will be undergoing additional surgery on his wrist. 26 In this case, the Court finds that it is appropriate to require Defendants to file a response to 27 Plaintiff’s motion to stay action. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within seven (7) 28 days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion 1 1 to stay action, (ECF No. 64). Plaintiff should not file any reply to Defendants’ response absent 2 further order from this Court. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?