Casillas v. Secretary of Corrections
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING 45 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER DENYING 40 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; and ORDER Directing Respondent to File an Answer to the Petition Within Sixty (60) Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/11/2018. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OMAR CASILLAS,
12
13
14
No. 1:17-00511-LJO-SKO
Petitioner,
v.
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS,
15
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(Docs. 40, 45)
16
17
Petitioner Omar Casillas is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304.
20
On August 16, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations in which
21
she recommended that the Court deny Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. The findings
22
and recommendations, which were served on all parties, provided that objections could be served
23
within thirty days.
24
On October 9, 2018, Respondent filed objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28
25
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), having carefully reviewed the entire file de novo and considered
26
Respondent's objections, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported
27
by the record and proper analysis.
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2018, be adopted in full (Doc. 45);
3
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 40) is denied;
4
3. Respondent is ordered to file an answer to the petition within 60 days of this Order.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
December 11, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?