Dennis v. Davey

Filing 4

ORDER OF INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-00755 GGH) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0529 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/12/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW DENNIS, 12 No. 2:17-cv-0755 GGH P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 DAVE DAVEY, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his 19 application, petitioner challenges a prison rules violation report. Petitioner is confined in 20 California State Prison, Corcoran which lies in Kings County. Kings County is part of the Fresno 21 Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 22 120(d). 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 24 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 25 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court 26 will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 27 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 1 1 2 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 3 4 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2017 9 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 /kly denn0755.109 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?