Dennis v. Davey
Filing
4
ORDER OF INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-00755 GGH) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0529 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/12/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTHEW DENNIS,
12
No. 2:17-cv-0755 GGH P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
DAVE DAVEY,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his
19
application, petitioner challenges a prison rules violation report. Petitioner is confined in
20
California State Prison, Corcoran which lies in Kings County. Kings County is part of the Fresno
21
Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule
22
120(d).
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
24
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
25
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court
26
will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.
27
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;
1
1
2
2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Fresno; and
3
4
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2017
9
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
/kly
denn0755.109
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?