Garraway v. Ciufo et al

Filing 146

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 145 Ex Parte Application to Continue Pretrial Conference; ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/12/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 5/22/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba; Defendants' Pretrial Statement Due: 5/8/2023; Jury Trial set for 8/1/2023 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

MITCHELL GARRAWAY,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9

vs.
JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,

10

Defendants.

1:17-cv-00533-ADA-GSA-PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
(ECF No. 145.)
AND

11

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL

12

Pretrial Conference
Continued From: October 17, 2022 at
1:30 p.m.

13
14

To:
15
16

May 22, 2023 at 1:30 p.m.
District Judge Ana de Alba
In Courtroom 1, 8th floor

Defendants’ Pretrial Statement Due:
May 8, 2023

17
18

Jury Trial

19

August 1, 2023 at 8:30 a.m.
District Judge Ana de Alba
In Courtroom 1, 8th floor

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

I.

BACKGROUND
Mitchell Garraway (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388
(1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017,
against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and

1

Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of

2

the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)

3

On May 28, 2021, the Court issued the Second Scheduling Order which scheduled a

4

Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing (hereinafter “Pretrial Conference”) for September 26,

5

2022 at 1:30 p.m. before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, and set a further schedule for this

6

litigation. (ECF No. 132.) Jury trial was not scheduled. On August 5, 2022, the Court continued

7

the Pretrial Conference to October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. (ECF No. 138.) On August 24, 2022,

8

due to the appointment of District Judge Ana de Alba to the bench of the Eastern District of

9

California, this case was assigned from District Judge Dale A. Drozd to District Judge Ana de

10

Alba for all further proceedings. (ECF No. 139.)

11

On September 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed his pretrial statement and motions for the attendance

12

of unincarcerated and incarcerated witnesses for trial. (ECF Nos. 140-142.) On September 8,

13

2022, Defendants filed an ex parte application to continue the Pretrial Conference and related

14

deadlines. (ECF No. 145.)

15

II.

DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION

16

Defendants request the Court to continue the Pretrial Conference currently set for October

17

17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. to May 22, 2023. They also request an extension of the deadline for filing

18

their pretrial statement from October 5, 2022 to May 8, 2022. They request a continuance for

19

two reasons: 1) defense counsel will be on an airplane on the date and time currently scheduled

20

for the Pretrial Conference, returning from international travel spanning October 7 to 17, and will

21

be in trial in Fresno during the two weeks prior (September 26 to October 6). (See declaration

22

of Victoria Boesh, ECF No. 145-1 at 2 ¶¶ 2, 3). 2) Defendants intend to seek leave to file a

23

motion for reconsideration of their motion for judgment on the pleadings,1 based on the United

24

States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Egbert v. Boule, No. 21-147, 2022 WL 2056291 (U.S.

25

June 8, 2022.) Because the motion for reconsideration may resolve this case, Defendants argue

26

that it makes sense to continue the Pretrial Conference to allow the court time to consider and

27
28

Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was filed on February 26, 2019.
(ECF No. 42.) On April 8, 2020, the Court issued an order denying the motion. (ECF No. 106.)
1

1

resolve that motion. They also propose filing their motion for reconsideration by December 8,

2

2022.

3

Discussion

4

Defense counsel has shown that she is unable to participate in the Pretrial Conference

5

scheduled for October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Defendants have also shown good cause why the

6

Pretrial Conference should be continued to allow Defendants time to file a motion for

7

reconsideration, which may resolve the case.

8

continuance shall be granted. The Pretrial Conference shall be continued to May 22, 2023 at

9

1:30 p.m., and Defendants’ pretrial statement shall be due on May 8, 2023.

Accordingly, Defendants’ application for a

10

The parties shall appear at the Pretrial Conference with each party connecting remotely

11

either via Zoom video conference or Zoom telephone number. The parties will be provided with

12

the Zoom ID and password by Judge de Alba’s Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The

13

Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire

14

is required.

15

Counsel for Defendants is required to contact Plaintiff’s institution to arrange for

16

Plaintiff’s participation in the Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro

17

se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents,

18

403 U.S. 388 (1971).

19

III.

20

TRIAL DATE NOW SCHEDULED
Jury trial for this case is scheduled for August 1, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. before District Judge

21

Ana de Alba in Courtroom 1 on the 8th floor.

22

IV.

23

CONCLUSION AND ORDER
The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

24

showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Due to the impacted nature of

25

the civil case docket, this Court disfavors requests to modify established dates.

26

Based on the foregoing, the court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

27

1.

28

Defendants’ ex parte application to continue the Pretrial Conference in this case,
filed on September 8, 2022, is GRANTED;

1

2.

The Pretrial Conference, currently scheduled for October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.,

2

is continued to May 22, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. before District Judge Ana de Alba in

3

Courtroom 1 on the 8th Floor;

4

3.

described in the Court’s Second Scheduling Order issued on May 28, 2021;

5
6

4.

7
8

5.

Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in
the Pretrial Conference, as discussed in this order;

6.

11
12

In addition to electronically filing a pretrial statement, Defendants shall e-mail the
pretrial statement to: [e-mail];

9
10

Defendants shall file and serve a pretrial statement on or before May 8, 2023, as

Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of incarcerated
witnesses, if any, shall be filed on or before May 8, 2023;

7.

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse

13

to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the court on or

14

before May 8, 2023, as described in subsection 4 of the Second Scheduling Order

15

issued on May 28, 2021;

16

8.

17
18

Jury trial for this case is scheduled for August 1, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. before District
Judge Ana de Alba in Courtroom 1 on the 8th floor; and

9.

19

All other provisions of the Second Scheduling Order issued on May 28, 2021,
remain the same.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 12, 2022

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE