Garraway v. Ciufo et al
Filing
149
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Request for Instructions to Expedite payment of travel expenses for unincarcerated witnesses 148 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/10/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MITCHELL GARRAWAY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO
EXPEDITE PAYMENT OF TRAVEL
EXPENSES FOR UNINCARCERATED
WITNESSES
(ECF No. 148.)
16
17
18
19
I.
BACKGROUND
20
Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights
21
action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now
22
proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants
23
Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza
24
(collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
25
(ECF No. 1.)
26
This case is scheduled for a Pretrial Conference (aka Trial Confirmation Hearing) on
27
October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Ana de Alba in Courtroom 1. To date, trial
28
has not been scheduled for this case.
1
On May 28, 2022, the court issued a Second Scheduling Order, which contained
2
instructions for Plaintiff to request witnesses to appear at trial. (ECF No. 132.) In the Order,
3
Plaintiff was advised as follows.
4
If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify
5
voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In
6
addition, the party seeking the witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum
7
of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the
8
appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the witness’s
9
travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.
10
If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated
11
witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the court in
12
writing of the name and location of each unincarcerated witness. The court will
13
calculate the travel expense for each unincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff
14
of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, submit a money order
15
made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses
16
plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the
17
unincarcerated witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is
18
tendered to the court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for
19
these expenses in civil cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is
20
required even if the party was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
21
(ECF No. 132 at 5-6 ¶4.)
22
On September 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed motions for the attendance of unincarcerated and
23
incarcerated witnesses at trial. (ECF Nos. 140, 141.) Plaintiff requested the attendance of two
24
unincarcerated witnesses, La Ronica Gardea (formerly employed at U.S. Penitentiary-Atwater)
25
and Corrections Officer Ciprian (currently employed at U.S. Penitentiary-Atwater). (ECF No.
26
140.) Plaintiff asserted that he is unable to provide these witnesses’ current addresses because
27
he is unable to ascertain the current place of employment of La Ronica Gardea, and he cannot
28
obtain an address for C/O Ciprian because of a lockdown at the prison. (Id.)
1
On October 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for instructions to expedite payment of travel
2
expenses for his unincarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 148.)
3
II.
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
4
Plaintiff again asserts that he is unable to obtain addresses for his two prospective
5
unincarcerated witnesses because federal inmates are not permitted to locate, obtain, or possess
6
addresses for Federal Bureau of Prisons staff.
7
and calculate travel expenses for his two witnesses so that Plaintiff can submit the required
8
money orders.
Plaintiff requests that the court obtain addresses
9
Plaintiff must obtain and provide his witnesses’ addresses to the court himself. The court
10
is not available to conduct research for Plaintiff.1 However, if Plaintiff has an address for U.S.
11
Penitentiary-Atwater, and his prospective witness C/O Ciprian is employed there, then Plaintiff
12
already has C/O Ciprian employer’s address.
13
Importantly, the deadline to initiate the process to obtain attendance of unincarcerated
14
witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily expired on October 5, 2022. (ECF No. 138 at 5.)
15
Plaintiff is advised to immediately file a motion for extension of the deadline for the court’s
16
consideration, showing good cause why the deadline to provide addresses and money orders
17
should be extended. If the deadline is not extended, then it is too late for Plaintiff to complete
18
the process to obtain attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily.
19
III.
CONCLUSION
20
Accordingly, the court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
21
1.
22
This matter is set for telephonic trial confirmation hearing before the Honorable
Ana de Alba on October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 1; and
23
24
25
26
27
28
It is not the court’s duty to act as Plaintiff’s counsel or paralegal in these matters.
Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152, 162, 120 S.Ct. 684, 145
L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (“[T]he trial judge is under no duty to provide personal instruction on courtroom
procedure or to perform any legal ‘chores’ for the defendant that counsel would normally carry out”);
Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231, 124 S. Ct. 2441, 2446, 159 L. Ed. 2d 338 (2004) (“Requiring district
courts to advise a pro se litigant in such a manner would undermine district judges’ role as impartial
decisionmakers.”).
1
1
2.
2
Plaintiff’s request for instructions to expedite payment of travel expenses for
unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily is granted by this order.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 10, 2022
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?