Garraway v. Ciufo et al

Filing 164

ORDER REFERRING 163 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Interlocutory Appeal to the Ninth Circuit, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/17/2023. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 12 13 14 15 1:17-cv-00533-ADA-GSA (PC) USCA Case No. 23-15482 Plaintiff, vs. JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al., Defendants. ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT (ECF No. 163.) 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, Mitchell Garraway, is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 21 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, 22 against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and 23 Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of 24 the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) 25 On March 31, 2023, Defendants filed a notice of interlocutory appeal to the Ninth Circuit 26 Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 160.) On April 14, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss 27 Defendants’ interlocutory appeal. (ECF No. 163.) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss is more properly 28 brought at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and shall be referred to the appeals court. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants’ interlocutory appeal, filed on April 14, 3 2023, is referred to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as more properly brought 4 at the appeals court; and 5 2. 6 The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2023 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?