Garraway v. Ciufo et al
Filing
164
ORDER REFERRING 163 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Interlocutory Appeal to the Ninth Circuit, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/17/2023. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MITCHELL GARRAWAY,
12
13
14
15
1:17-cv-00533-ADA-GSA (PC)
USCA Case No. 23-15482
Plaintiff,
vs.
JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL TO THE
NINTH CIRCUIT
(ECF No. 163.)
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff, Mitchell Garraway, is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
20
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388
21
(1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017,
22
against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and
23
Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of
24
the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)
25
On March 31, 2023, Defendants filed a notice of interlocutory appeal to the Ninth Circuit
26
Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 160.) On April 14, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss
27
Defendants’ interlocutory appeal. (ECF No. 163.) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss is more properly
28
brought at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and shall be referred to the appeals court.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants’ interlocutory appeal, filed on April 14,
3
2023, is referred to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as more properly brought
4
at the appeals court; and
5
2.
6
The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 17, 2023
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?