Garraway v. Ciufo et al

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/22/19. Deadline: 4/5/2019.(Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al., Defendants. 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLIES (ECF No. 63.) DEADLINE: APRIL 5, 2019 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 21 Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s 22 original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), 23 K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for 24 failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) 25 On March 20, 2019, Defendants filed an ex parte motion for an extension of time until 26 April 5, 2019 for defendants Ciufo, Miller, and Zaragoza to file a reply in support of their motion 27 for judgment on the pleadings, and for defendant Miller to file a reply in support of his motion 28 for summary judgment. (ECF No. 63.) 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 The Court finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Ciufo, Miller, and Zaragoza are granted an extension of time until April 5, 2019, to file a reply in support of their motion for judgment on the pleadings; and 2. Defendant Miller is granted an extension of time until April 5, 2019, to file a reply in support of his motion for summary judgment. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2019 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?