Garraway v. Ciufo et al
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/22/19. Deadline: 4/5/2019.(Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MITCHELL GARRAWAY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,
Defendants.
1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE REPLIES
(ECF No. 63.)
DEADLINE: APRIL 5, 2019
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to
21
Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s
22
original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager),
23
K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for
24
failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)
25
On March 20, 2019, Defendants filed an ex parte motion for an extension of time until
26
April 5, 2019 for defendants Ciufo, Miller, and Zaragoza to file a reply in support of their motion
27
for judgment on the pleadings, and for defendant Miller to file a reply in support of his motion
28
for summary judgment. (ECF No. 63.)
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
The Court finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time. Accordingly, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants Ciufo, Miller, and Zaragoza are granted an extension of time until
April 5, 2019, to file a reply in support of their motion for judgment on the pleadings; and
2.
Defendant Miller is granted an extension of time until April 5, 2019, to file a reply
in support of his motion for summary judgment.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 22, 2019
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?