Brim v. Vazquez

Filing 12

ORDER of Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/24/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 EURIE BRIM III, 5 Petitioner, 6 7 No. 1:17-cv-00536-SKO HC ORDER OF CLARIFICATION v. P. L. VASQUEZ, Warden, 8 Respondent. (Doc. 11) 9 Petitioner Eurie Brim III is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 10 11 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 10, 2017, Petitioner filed a second request 12 for clarification concerning his submission of an amended petition. Petitioner specifically asked 13 whether the amended petition should include all exhibits. Petitioner is hereby directed to file his 14 amended petition with all exhibits and appendices that are necessary for the Court to understand 15 16 the petition. The petition should refer to each such exhibit or appendix by an identifying letter or number (for example, “Exhibit 1” or “Exhibit A”). Petitioner need not include general legal 17 18 19 documents from his state court actions since Respondent will file a complete state record with his answer. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file 20 21 22 his amended complaint with the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?