Brim v. Vazquez

Filing 12

ORDER of Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/24/2017. (Flores, E)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

EURIE BRIM III,

5

Petitioner,

6
7

No. 1:17-cv-00536-SKO HC
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

v.
P. L. VASQUEZ, Warden,

8

Respondent.

(Doc. 11)

9
Petitioner Eurie Brim III is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

10
11

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 10, 2017, Petitioner filed a second request

12

for clarification concerning his submission of an amended petition. Petitioner specifically asked

13

whether the amended petition should include all exhibits. Petitioner is hereby directed to file his

14

amended petition with all exhibits and appendices that are necessary for the Court to understand

15
16

the petition. The petition should refer to each such exhibit or appendix by an identifying letter or
number (for example, “Exhibit 1” or “Exhibit A”). Petitioner need not include general legal

17
18
19

documents from his state court actions since Respondent will file a complete state record with his
answer.
It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file

20
21
22

his amended complaint with the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno
Division.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 24, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

.