Zamora v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 17

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/18/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 11/10/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 5/14/2018; Expert 7/27/2018. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 1/12/2018 at 08:30 AM in Ba kersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 8/10/2018; Hearing by 9/7/2018. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/21/2018; Hearing by 11/6/2018. Pretrial Conference set for 12/10/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 2/26/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

VERONICA ZAMORA,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NORTH AMERICA,

14

Defendant.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:17-CV-00544 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 11/10/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Non-Expert: 5/14/2018
Expert: 7/27/2018
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
1/12/2018 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/10/2018
Hearing: 9/7/2018

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/21/2018
Hearing: 11/6/2018

20
21

23

Pre-Trial Conference:
12/10/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5

24

Trial:

22

25
26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
July 18, 2017.
1

2/26/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 7-10 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Glenn Kantor appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Melissa Cowan appeared on behalf of Defendant.

4

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

5

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

6

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

7

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

8

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

9

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

10

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

11
12

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

13

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

14

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

16

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

17
18

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

19

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

20

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

21

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

22
23

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

24

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

25

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

26

IV.

27
28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

motion to amend, no later than November 10, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleadings shall be heard
2

1

by the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

2

V.

3

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). The

4

parties are ordered to complete all nonexpert on or before May 14, 2018 and expert discovery by July

5

27, 2018.

6

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before June 1, 2018,

7

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before June 29, 2018. The written designation of retained and

8

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

9

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

10

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

11

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

12

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

13

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

14

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

15

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

16
17

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

18

A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for January 12, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. before the

19

Judge Thurston, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-

20

discovery status conference report one week before the conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the

21

status report via e-mail to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

22

discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

23

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via

24

teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate

25

Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later

26

than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

27
28

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.

3

1

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

2
3

than August 10, 2018, and heard on or before September 7, 2018. Discovery motions are heard before

4

the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

5

Bakersfield, California. For these hearings, counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888)

6

557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy

7

Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before

8

the noticed hearing date. All other non-dispositive hearings SHALL be set before Judge Drozd.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

9
10

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

11

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

12

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

13

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

14

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

15

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

16

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

17

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

18

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

19

from the Court’s calendar.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than September 21, 2018 and heard no

20
21

later than November 6, 2018, in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States

22

District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and

23

Local Rules 230 and 260.

24

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

25

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

26

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

27

to be raised in the motion.

28

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
4

1

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

2

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

3

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

4

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

5
6

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

7

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

8

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

9

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

10
11

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

12

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

13

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

14

December 10, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

15

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

16

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

17

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

18
19

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

20

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

21

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

22

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

23

IX.

24
25

Trial Date
February 26, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

States District Court Judge.

26

A.

This is a jury trial.

27

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 7-10 days.

28

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
5

1

California, Rule 285.

2

X.

Settlement Conference
The parties participated in a Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Thurston on July 17,

3
4

2018. If they agree a further settlement conference would be fruitful, they may request the Court set a

5

further settlement conference.

6

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

7

Techniques to Shorten Trial

8

Not applicable at this time.

9

XII.

There are no pending related matters.

10
11

Related Matters Pending

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

12
13

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

14

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

15

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

16

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

17

XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

18
19

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

20

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

21

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

22

subsequent status conference.
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

23
24

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

25

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

26

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

27

for granting the relief requested.

28

///
6

1

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 18, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7