Pouncil v. Sherman et al
Filing
40
ORDER Regarding Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/29/19. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MADERO POUNCIL,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00547-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
D. LOPEZ,
(ECF No. 39)
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff Madero Pouncil is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
Currently before the Court is a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice, filed on
20
July 26, 2019. (ECF No. 39). The stipulation states that, since Plaintiff and Defendant Lopez have
21
resolved this case in its entirety, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action, with prejudice,
22
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The stipulation is signed and dated by
23
Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Lopez, and indicates that each party shall bear its own litigation
24
costs and attorney’s fees.
25
“The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of his claims,
26
through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice. The filing of a notice of voluntary dismissal with the court
27
automatically terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson
28
v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted).
1
1
Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the
2
Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending
3
motions and deadlines and close this case.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
July 29, 2019
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?