Williams v. Pfieffer, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER on Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Brookman With Prejudice (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/10/2018. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069 Supervising Deputy Attorney General LARAYA M. PARNELL, State Bar No. 307200 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7335 Facsimile: (916) 324-5205 Attorneys for Defendants Brookman, Arreola, Franco, Mason, McCollough, and Terrazas 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO 11 12 13 Case No. 1:17-cv-00549-AWI-EPG (PC) DONALD LEE WILLIAMS, 14 v. 15 16 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BROOKMAN WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) C. PFIEFFER, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Donald Lee Williams and Defendant Brookman stipulate to a voluntary dismissal 20 of this action with prejudice as to Defendant Brookman under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 22 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:17-cv-00549 AWI EPG) 1 It is so stipulated. 2 3 Dated: August 8, 2018 /s/ Ben Rudin . Ben Rudin, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Donald Lee Williams Dated: August 8, 2018 /s/ Laraya M. Parnell Laraya M. Parnell Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General's Office Attorney for Defendant Brookman 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: August 10, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SA2017109837 23 33504533.doc 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:17-cv-00549 AWI EPG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?