Amador, et al. v. City of Ceres

Filing 31

ORDER reassigning case to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/23/2018. The new case number is 1:17-cv-00552-DAD-BAM. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIO AMADOR, et al., 12 13 14 No. 1:17-cv-00552-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER REASSIGNING CASE CITY OF CERES, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Review of the court record in above-captioned action entitled Amador et al. v. City of 18 Ceres, No. 1:17-cv-00552-DAD-SAB (“the instant action”), reveals it has been related by the 19 undersigned under this court’s Local Rule 123 to the following actions pending before the 20 undersigned: (1) McManus et al. v. City of Ceres, No. 1:17-cv-00355-DAD-BAM; (2) Quiroz v. 21 City of Ceres, No. 1:17-cv-00444-DAD-BAM; and Miranda v. City of Ceres, No. 1:18-cv-00041- 22 DAD-BAM. All four actions had been assigned to the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Michael 23 J. Seng. Due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, the actions were randomly 24 reassigned to other magistrate judges. The instant action was reassigned to Magistrate Judge 25 Stanley A. Boone. The other three actions were reassigned to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. 26 McAuliffe. 27 28 Accordingly, assignment of the actions to the undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe will promote efficiency and economy for the court and parties. Good 1 1 cause appearing, the court orders that the instant action be reassigned from Magistrate Judge 2 Stanley A. Boone to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. 3 Accordingly, all documents filed in the above-referenced action shall now bear the 4 following new case number: 1:17-cv-00552-DAD-BAM. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: April 23, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?