Mendez v. United States of America et al

Filing 78

ORDER GRANTING 77 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/2/2020. Sixty-Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiff, 13 14 1:17-cv-0555-NONE-JLT (PC) FELIPE MENDEZ, JR., v. (Doc. 77) UNITED STATES, et al., 15 SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 17 The Court issued findings and recommendations to grant defendants’ motion for summary 18 judgment. (Doc. 72.) At that time, Plaintiff immediately moved for an extension of time to file his 19 objections. (Doc. 73.) The Court granted the extension and directed him to file his objections by 20 July 1, 2020. (Doc. 74.) Plaintiff now moves for an emergency stay of these proceedings or 21 additional time to obtain discovery and expert discovery in support of his objections. (Doc. 77.) 22 Plaintiff, who is housed at Federal Correctional Institution in Lompoc, California, asserts that an 23 extension of time is necessary because of institutional lockdowns due to Covid-19 and because 24 Plaintiff himself tested positive for Covid-19 in May 2020. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion 25 as a request for extension of time to file his objections. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 2 Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his objections within sixty days from the date of this Order. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?