Mendez v. United States of America et al
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING 77 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/2/2020. Sixty-Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:17-cv-0555-NONE-JLT (PC)
FELIPE MENDEZ, JR.,
v.
(Doc. 77)
UNITED STATES, et al.,
15
SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE
Defendant.
16
17
The Court issued findings and recommendations to grant defendants’ motion for summary
18
judgment. (Doc. 72.) At that time, Plaintiff immediately moved for an extension of time to file his
19
objections. (Doc. 73.) The Court granted the extension and directed him to file his objections by
20
July 1, 2020. (Doc. 74.) Plaintiff now moves for an emergency stay of these proceedings or
21
additional time to obtain discovery and expert discovery in support of his objections. (Doc. 77.)
22
Plaintiff, who is housed at Federal Correctional Institution in Lompoc, California, asserts that an
23
extension of time is necessary because of institutional lockdowns due to Covid-19 and because
24
Plaintiff himself tested positive for Covid-19 in May 2020. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion
25
as a request for extension of time to file his objections.
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
2
Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his objections
within sixty days from the date of this Order.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 2, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?