Lipsey v. Reddy et al

Filing 57

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Motion for Preliminary Injunction 49 , 51 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/29/2018. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

vs.
DR. REDDY, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00569-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
(Doc. No. 49, 51)

Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

18

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On May 29, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction seeking that the

21

Court direct CDCR to immediately send his property to his new housing location. (Doc. No. 49.)

22

On June 4, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that

23

the motion be denied. (Doc. No. 51.) The Magistrate Judge also granted Plaintiff an extension

24

of time to comply with a pending deadline based on the delay in processing his property. (Doc.

25

No. 50.)

26

The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that

27

any objections must be filed within fourteen days after service of that order. (Doc. 51, at 3.)

28

That deadline has passed, and no objections were filed.

1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

2

a de novo review of this case and carefully reviewed the entire file. The Court finds that the

3

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

adopted in full; and

6
7

The findings and recommendations, dated June 4, 2018 (Doc. No. 51), are

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, filed on May 29, 2018 (Doc. No.
49), is denied.

8
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

June 29, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2