Lipsey v. Reddy et al
Filing
62
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey Court Order 60 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/18/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
DR. REDDY, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-00569-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY
COURT ORDER
(Doc. 60)
16
Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
17
18
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 2, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.
19
20
(Doc. 45.) The Court did not receive any timely response to the motion, nor had Plaintiff
21
otherwise been in contact with the Court since he filed a motion for preliminary injunction on
22
May 29, 2018. (Doc. 49.)
On July 17, 2017, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be
23
24
dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court’s order and for failure to prosecute.
25
(Doc. 60.) The Court ordered that Plaintiff could comply by responding to Defendants’
26
summary judgment motion. (Id.) After the order was issued, the Court received Plaintiff’s
27
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 58), as supplemented, (Doc. 59).
28
///
1
1
Based on Plaintiff’s compliance, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the order to show
2
cause issued on July 17, 2018 (Doc. 60), is discharged. The Court will issue findings and
3
recommendations on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in due course.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
July 18, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?