Casildo, et al. v. Esparza Enterprises, Inc
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING 54 an Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/9/2020. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OLGA CASILDO, et al.
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
ESPARZA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00601 – LJO JLT
)
) ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME
)
) (Doc. 54)
)
)
)
)
)
On November 1, 2019, the parties reported they “reached a settlement in principle” and
18
planned to finalize a written agreement. (Doc. 51) The Court ordered the parties to file a stipulation
19
to dismiss no later than January 2, 2020. (Doc. 53) The parties now request an extension of time,
20
reporting they “are working diligently to secure all signatures on the agreement,” but faced delays in
21
doing so because the eleven named plaintiffs “are farm workers without easy access to the technology
22
to sign and scan signature pages, making in-person meetings necessary.” (Doc. 54 at 2) The parties
23
also report that several of the plaintiffs were “unavailable during the holidays.” (Id.) Therefore, the
24
parties request an extension to February 3, 2020. (See id. at 2-3)
25
26
Notably, at this juncture, the parties have not clarified whether the action has settled only the
individual claims of the named plaintiffs, or whether the claims of the class have likewise been settled.
27
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
28
1.
The parties’ request for an extension of time is GRANTED;
1
1
2.
preliminary approval of the class action settlement no later than February 3, 2020; and
2
3
Plaintiffs SHALL file a stipulation of dismissal or, in the alternative, a motion for
3.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate all remaining motions and hearings.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 9, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?