Hernandez v. National Express Transit Corporation et al

Filing 16

ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to close case signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/27/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JORGE GUZMAN HERNANDEZ, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff Case No. 1:17-cv-00610-DAD-EPG ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE v. (ECF No. 15) NATIONAL EXPRESS TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 9 10 On June 27, 2017, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez filed a notice of voluntary dismissal 11 dismissing his claims against Defendant Daniel Klemple without prejudice. (ECF No. 7.) 12 On November 20, 2017, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez filed a stipulation of dismissal of the 13 remainder of the claims in the case. (ECF No. 15). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In 14 light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 16 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the 17 plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 18 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: November 27, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?