Hernandez v. National Express Transit Corporation et al

Filing 16

ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to close case signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/27/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

JORGE GUZMAN HERNANDEZ,

5
6
7
8

Plaintiff

Case No. 1:17-cv-00610-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 15)
NATIONAL EXPRESS TRANSIT
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

9
10

On June 27, 2017, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez filed a notice of voluntary dismissal
11
dismissing his claims against Defendant Daniel Klemple without prejudice. (ECF No. 7.)
12
On November 20, 2017, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez filed a stipulation of dismissal of the
13
remainder of the claims in the case. (ECF No. 15). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In
14
light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
15
41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London,
16

62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the

17
plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule
18

41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated:

November 27, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
1