Cathy v. Hicks et al

Filing 14

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/20/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CHARLES RAY CATHY, Plaintiff, 5 6 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE v. 7 Case No. 1:17-cv-00624-EPG B. HICKS, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendant. 8 9 10 On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. 11 (ECF No. 13.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has 12 ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 13 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) 14 (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action 15 voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the 16 Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?