Cathy v. Hicks et al

Filing 14

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/20/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CHARLES RAY CATHY,
Plaintiff,

5
6

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.

7

Case No. 1:17-cv-00624-EPG

B. HICKS, et al.,

(ECF No. 13)
Defendant.

8
9
10

On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice.

11

(ECF No. 13.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has

12

ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San

13

Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995)

14

(“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action

15

voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the

16

Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 20, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1