Voss v. Baker
Filing
48
ORDER Requiring Status Report signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 05/10/2018. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
CRAIG WILLIAM VOSS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:17-cv-00626-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS REPORT
v.
(ECF NOS. 46 & 47)
BRIAN BAKER,
Defendant.
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
16
17
18
On September 26, 2017, the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) returned the
19
summons unexecuted as to Brian Baker, the defendant in this action. (ECF No. 14). USMS
20
certified that it was unable to locate Brian Baker for service of process. (Id.). Plaintiff
21
requested, and was granted, the issuance of a third party subpoena directed to the California
22
Department of Motor Vehicles so that he could find the last known address of Brian Baker.
23
(ECF No. 44).
24
The subpoena was served on March 19, 2018 (ECF No. 47), with a response date of
25
April 6, 2018 (ECF No. 46, p. 1, n. 1). The response date passed over a month ago, and
26
Plaintiff has not filed a motion to compel, provided the Court with an updated address for Brian
27
Baker, or requested another third party subpoena.
28
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of
1
1
service of this order to provide a status report regarding his efforts to obtain the last known
2
address of Brian Baker.
3
Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 10, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?