Willie A. Norman v. Meux #778 et al
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to Sacramento Division, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/9/17. New Case Number 2:17-cv-998-KJN. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:17-cv-00631 GSA (PC)
WILLIE A. NORMAN,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
MEUX #778, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. ' 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
19
' 1915.
20
21
22
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged
violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should
23
have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
25
26
27
28
court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action
will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not rule on plaintiff's request to
proceed in forma pauperis.
1
1
2
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
4
5
6
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
7
8
9
3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 9, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?