Cliff v. Matevousian
Filing
22
ORDER adopting 13 Findings and Recommendations; denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and referring back to Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/9/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTRONE CLIFF,
12
13
14
15
No. 1:17-cv-00641-DAD-JLT
Petitioner,
v.
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,
Respondent.
16
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
AND REFERRING BACK TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
(Doc. Nos. 8, 13)
17
18
Petitioner is proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on May 18, 2017.
20
(Doc. No. 8.) On May 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
21
recommendations recommending petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc.
22
No. 13). These findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice
23
that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service. To
24
date, no party has filed objections, and the time in which to do so has passed.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the undersigned has
26
conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
undersigned concludes that the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported
28
by the record and proper analysis.
1
1
2
3
Given the foregoing:
1. The findings and recommendations issued May 22, 2017 (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in
full;
4
2. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is denied; and
5
3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 9, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?