Cliff v. Matevousian

Filing 22

ORDER adopting 13 Findings and Recommendations; denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and referring back to Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/9/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTRONE CLIFF,

12
13
14
15

No. 1:17-cv-00641-DAD-JLT

Petitioner,
v.
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,
Respondent.

16

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
AND REFERRING BACK TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
(Doc. Nos. 8, 13)

17
18

Petitioner is proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

19

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on May 18, 2017.

20

(Doc. No. 8.) On May 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

21

recommendations recommending petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc.

22

No. 13). These findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice

23

that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service. To

24

date, no party has filed objections, and the time in which to do so has passed.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the undersigned has

26

conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

undersigned concludes that the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported

28

by the record and proper analysis.
1

1
2
3

Given the foregoing:
1. The findings and recommendations issued May 22, 2017 (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in
full;

4

2. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is denied; and

5

3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 9, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2