McMillen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER for a Third Extension of Time of 14 Days for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. Defendant has until June 1, 2018, to submit a response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) shall be extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/21/2018. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 FRED D. MCMILLEN IV, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00664-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME OF 14 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 22) 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 21 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 14 additional days to 22 respond to Plaintiff’s opening brief. The current due date is May 18, 2018. The new due date 23 will be June 1, 2018. 24 Since the granting of Defendant’s previous request for a 14-day extension of time, 25 Defendant’s counsel has been diligently addressing her full workload and a backlog of cases due 26 to her leave to attend to a personal emergency from about a month ago. Defendant’s counsel is 27 continuing to prioritize this case while addressing her remaining workload. 28 1 1 Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional 14 days, up to and including June 1, 2 2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s opening brief in 3 this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 4 5 6 Respectfully submitted, Date: May 18, 2018 FORSLUND LAW LLC 7 s/ Jacqueline A. Forslund by C.Chen* (As authorized by email on 5/18/2018) JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 11 Date: May 18, 2018 12 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s third “Stipulation for an Extension of Time of 14 20 Days for Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief.” (Doc. 22.) Pursuant to parties’ 21 second “Stipulation for Extension of Time” for (Doc. 21), Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s 22 Opening Brief was due May 18, 2018, the same day on which Defendant filed the present third 23 request for extension. 24 Requests for extension are governed by Rule 144 of the Local Rules of the United States 25 District Court, Eastern District of California (“Local Rules”). Local Rule 144(d) explains that 26 “[r]equests for Court-approved extensions brought on the required filing date for the pleading or 27 other document are looked upon with disfavor.” The parties are hereby ADMONISHED that 28 any future requests for extensions of time shall be brought in advance of the required filing date 2 1 and be supported by good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). However, given defense 2 counsel’s representations that she “has been diligently addressing her full workload and a 3 backlog of cases due to her leave to attend to a personal emergency from about a month ago” 4 (see Doc. 22 at 1), and the fact that Plaintiff consents to the request, the Court GRANTS the 5 parties’ request for an extension. 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant has until June 1, 2018, to submit a response 7 to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) shall be extended 8 accordingly. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 21, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?