Brown v. Jonathan Neil and Associates, Inc.
Filing
10
SCHEDULING ORDER - Class Certification Deadline: Motion Filing 1/12/2018; Discovery Deadline: 12/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/27/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
TERI BROWN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16)
Plaintiff,
11
Class Certification Deadline:
Motion Filing: January 12, 2018
12
Discovery Deadline: December 11, 2017
13
14
Case No. 1: 17-cv-00675-LJO-SAB
v.
15
16
17
JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES,
INC.,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
I.
22
The Scheduling Conference was held on July 27, 2017.
23
II.
24
Yitzchak Zelman telephonically appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.
25
Christopher Egan telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants.
26
III.
27
The parties have not filed a consent or decline form in this matter.
Date of Scheduling Conference
Appearances of Counsel
Consent to Magistrate Judge
28
1
1
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District
2
Judge caseload in the entire nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case
3
and all other civil cases in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’
4
needs and expectations may be met as expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being
5
set to begin upon the same date, parties may find their case trailing with little notice before the
6
trial begins when the case is heard before a United States District Judge. The law requires the
7
Court give any criminal case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the Court must
8
proceed with criminal trials even if a civil trial is older or was set earlier. Continuances of civil
9
trials under these circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding
10
of good cause. If multiple trials are scheduled to begin on the same day, this civil trial will trail
11
day to day or week to week until completion of any criminal case or older civil case.
12
The parties are advised of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct
13
all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials,
14
including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil
15
Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. The parties are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate
16
jurisdiction without adverse substantive consequences.
17
IV.
18
The parties shall exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or
19
Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
before August 18, 2017.
20
V.
Amendments to Pleading
21
Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later
22
than September 29, 2017.
The parties are advised that filing motions and/or stipulations
23
requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not reflect on the propriety of the amendment or
24
imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if necessary. All proposed amendments must
25
(A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any
26
modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604,
27
609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not
28
(1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or
2
1
(4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).
2
VI.
Class Certification
3
The Court finds that discovery shall proceed by a phased approach in this matter. This
4
first phase shall relate to class certification. Any motions for class certification shall be filed on
5
or before January 12, 2018. The hearing on the class certification motion shall be set before the
6
undersigned pursuant to the Local Rule.
7
VII.
8
The parties are ordered to complete all class certification discovery on or before
9
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates
December 11, 2017.
10
The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to
11
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B) and (C) and shall include all information required
12
thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court
13
excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through the experts that are not properly
14
disclosed in compliance with this order.
15
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to
16
experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and
17
opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions,
18
which may include striking the expert designation and the exclusion of their testimony.
19
20
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
21
The parties are cautioned that the discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates by
22
which all discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be heard
23
after the discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a
24
discovery motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the
25
relevant discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be
26
served sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to
27
meet and confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a
28
motion to compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing
3
1
discovery deadlines. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel be
2
filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant
3
effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party's failure to have a discovery dispute
4
heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as
5
untimely.
6
VIII. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
7
Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all
8
moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five
9
(25) pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before
10
scheduling any motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230
11
and 251.
12
A.
Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions
13
As noted, all non-expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed no
14
later than December 11, 2017. All expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be
15
completed no later than December 11, 2017. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires
16
motions to compel be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the
17
Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a
18
discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the
19
motion as untimely. Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before
20
United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9.
21
In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications
22
for an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not
23
obtain an Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
24
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, providing a written
25
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than three (3)
26
court days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to
27
appear by telephone, then it shall be the obligation of the moving party(ies) to arrange and
28
originate a conference call to the court.
4
1
Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the parties must
2
prepare and file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”) as required by
3
Local Rule 251. The Joint Statement must be filed seven (7) calendar days before the scheduled
4
hearing date. Courtesy copies of all motion-related documents, declarations, and exhibits must be
5
delivered to the Clerk’s Office by 10:00 a.m. on the fourth court day prior to the scheduled
6
hearing date. Motions will be removed from the court’s hearing calendar if the Joint Statement is
7
not timely filed or if courtesy copies are not timely delivered. In order to satisfy the meet and
8
confer requirement set forth in Local Rule 251(b), the parties must confer and talk to each other
9
in person, over the telephone or via video conferencing before the hearing about the discovery
10
dispute. The Court may issue sanctions against the moving party or the opposing party if either
11
party fails to meet and confer in good faith.
12
B.
Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions
13
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication: Prior to filing a motion for
14
summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in
15
person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion.
16
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment
17
where a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has
18
merit in whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of
19
briefing; 4) narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement
20
before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a
21
Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts.
22
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the Joint Statement of
23
Undisputed Facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall
24
file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts.
25
In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and
26
conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and
27
confer.
28
///
5
1
IX.
Related Matters Pending
2
There are no related cases currently pending.
3
X.
4
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil
5
Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
6
amendments thereto.
7
efficiently handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the
8
Rules as provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the
9
Eastern District of California.
Compliance with Federal Procedure
The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to
10
Additional requirements and more detailed procedures for courtroom practice before
11
United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone can be found at the United States District Court
12
for the Eastern District of California’s website (www.caed.uscourts.gov) under Judges; United
13
States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone (SAB).
14
Procedures,” there is a link to “Standard Information.” All parties and counsel shall comply with
15
the guidelines set forth therein.
In the area entitled “Case Management
16
XI.
Effect of this Order
17
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda
18
most suitable to dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule
19
outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered to notify the court immediately of that
20
fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference.
21
Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless
22
they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached
23
exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. The parties are
24
advised that due to the impacted nature of civil cases on the district judges in the Eastern
25
District of California, Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored
26
and will not be granted absent good cause.
27
Lastly, should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to comply with the directions
28
as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including
6
1
monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed
2
and/or ordered.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?