Brown v. Jonathan Neil and Associates, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER REQUIRING Ari H. Marcus to SHOW CAUSE Why Pro Hac Vice Application should not be Denied; Show Cause Response due within Five (5) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/12/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TERI BROWN,

11

ORDER REQUIRING ARI H. MARCUS’ TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY PRO HAC VICE
APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

Plaintiff,

9
10

Case No. 1:17-cv-00675-LJO-SAB

v.
JONATHAN NEIL AND ASSOCIATES,
INC.,

(ECF No. 13)

12
Defendant.
13
14

The court has read and considered the application of Ari H. Marcus, attorney for, Plaintiff

15 Teri Brown for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2)
16 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District. Local Rule
17 180 provides
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

The pro hac vice application shall be electronically presented to the Clerk and
shall state under penalty of perjury . . . if the attorney has concurrently or within
the year preceding the current application made any other pro hac vice
applications to this Court, the title and number of each action in which such
application was made, the date of each application, and whether each application
was granted.
L.R. 180(b)(2)(i).
In the current application, counsel states under penalty of perjury that he has not
concurrently or within the preceding year made a pro hac vice application to this court. (ECF
No. 13.) However, on June 21, 2017, counsel submitted a pro hac vice application to represent
the same plaintiff in Brown v. Charter Communications, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00670-LJO-JLT (E.D.
Cal.). Mr. Marcus’ application was granted on August 30, 2017.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of entry of

28

1

1 this order, Ari H. Marcus shall show cause in writing why his pro hac vice application should not
2 be denied for failure to comply with Rule 180.
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated:

December 12, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2