King v. Villegas et al
Filing
44
ORDER re: Plaintiff's Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/19/18. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JERRY LEE KING,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC)
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
SUBMISSION OF CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENT
R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ,
(ECF NO. 43)
10
Defendants.
11
Jerry King (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
12
13
civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of submission of confidential settlement
14
15
conference statement. (ECF No. 43). Plaintiff states that he submitted his confidential settlement
16
conference statement in an envelope marked confidential, but that the Clerk of Court opened the
17
envelope, stamped it as received, and sent it back with a habeas corpus petition. Plaintiff asks
18
what he is supposed to do now.
It is unclear why the Clerk of Court would return Plaintiff’s confidential settlement
19
20
conference statement to him, with a habeas petition attached. This is not the standard practice
21
and the Clerk’s office does not have a record of doing so.
22
In any event, the settlement conference statement was not filed, and the Court does not
23
have a copy of it. Plaintiff should resubmit the confidential settlement conference statement at
24
least seven days prior to the date of the settlement conference.
25
\\\
26
\\\
27
\\\
28
1
1
2
Plaintiff should make sure that the document in clearly labeled as a confidential settlement
conference statement with the correct case number.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 19, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?