King v. Villegas et al

Filing 44

ORDER re: Plaintiff's Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/19/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JERRY LEE KING, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 v. Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, (ECF NO. 43) 10 Defendants. 11 Jerry King (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 12 13 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of submission of confidential settlement 14 15 conference statement. (ECF No. 43). Plaintiff states that he submitted his confidential settlement 16 conference statement in an envelope marked confidential, but that the Clerk of Court opened the 17 envelope, stamped it as received, and sent it back with a habeas corpus petition. Plaintiff asks 18 what he is supposed to do now. It is unclear why the Clerk of Court would return Plaintiff’s confidential settlement 19 20 conference statement to him, with a habeas petition attached. This is not the standard practice 21 and the Clerk’s office does not have a record of doing so. 22 In any event, the settlement conference statement was not filed, and the Court does not 23 have a copy of it. Plaintiff should resubmit the confidential settlement conference statement at 24 least seven days prior to the date of the settlement conference. 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 1 1 2 Plaintiff should make sure that the document in clearly labeled as a confidential settlement conference statement with the correct case number. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 19, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?