King v. Villegas et al
Filing
50
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 49 Motion for Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum, without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 02/12/2019. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JERRY LEE KING,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ,
14
Defendants.
(ECF NO. 49)
15
16
17
18
19
Jerry King (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On February 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for the issuance of a subpoena duces
20
tecum. (ECF No. 49). Plaintiff asks that the Warden of Kern Valley State Prison be ordered to
21
produce a CD containing video surveillance evidence (Plaintiff alleges that a camera recorded
22
the incident on August 17, 2016, at 9:55 a.m.). Alternatively, if the camera did not record,
23
Plaintiff asks for documents containing the names of the officers who watched the live feed
24
monitors.
25
It appears that Plaintiff is seeking relevant documents and electronically stored
26
information. However, Plaintiff failed to make a showing that the requested documents and
27
electronically stored information are only available through a third party. (See ECF No. 36, p.
28
4). Plaintiff should first request the documents and electronically stored information from
1
1
Defendants. If Defendants object on the ground that they do not have possession, custody, or
2
control of the documents and electronically stored information, Plaintiff may refile this motion,
3
along with Defendants’ objection.
4
5
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of a
subpoena duces tecum is DENIED without prejudice.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 12, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?