Silas v. Argent Mortgage Company, LLC its Successors and/or Assigns

Filing 22

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/18/2017. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Motion for Judgment Deadlines: Filed by 9/5/2017; Opposition by 9/26/2017; Reply by 10/3/2017; Hearing by 10/17/2017. Pleading Amen dment Deadline 1/19/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 11/1/2017; Non-Expert 7/2/2018; Expert 9/10/2018. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 3/2/2018 at 08:45 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. T hurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/18/2018; Hearing by 10/16/2018. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/30/2018; Hearing by 12/11/2018. Pretrial Conference set for 2/5/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 4/2/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RODRICK J. SILAS,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No.: 1:17-cv-0703 LJO JLT

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Motion for Judgment Deadlines:
Motion: 9/5/2017
Opposition: 9/26/2017
Reply: 10/3/2017
Hearing: 10/17/2017, Courtroom 4
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 1/19/2017

16

Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 11/1/2017
Non-Expert: 7/2/2018
Expert: 9/10/2018
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
3/2/2018 at 8:45 a.m.

17
18
19

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/18/2018
Hearing: 10/16/2018

20
21
22

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 10/30/2018
Hearing: 12/11/2018

23
24

Pre-Trial Conference:
2/5/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

25
26

Trial:

27
28
1

4/2/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 2-4 days

1

I.

August 18, 2017.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Plaintiff appeared in pro per.

5

Kalley Aman appeared on behalf of Defendant

6

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

7

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

8

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

9

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

10

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

11

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

12

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

13
14

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

15

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

16

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

18

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

19
20

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

21

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

22

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

23

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

24
25

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

26

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

27

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

28

///
2

1

IV.

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Deadlines
Defendant Argent Mortgage Company notified the Court of its intent to file a motion for

2
3

judgment on the pleadings. Any motion for judgment on the pleadings SHALL be filed no later than

4

September 5, 2017, and heard no later than October 17, 2017, in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable

5

Lawrence J. O'Neill, United States District Court Judge.
Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion SHALL be filed no later than September 26, 2017. Any

6
7

reply by Defendant SHALL be filed no later than October 3, 2017.

8

V.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

9
10

motion to amend, no later than January 19, 2017.

11

VI.

12
13
14
15

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before November 1, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before July 2,
2018, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before September 10, 2018.

16

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before July 16, 2018,

17

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before August 13, 2018. The written designation of retained

18

and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C)

19

and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance

20

with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

21

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

22

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

23

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

24

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

25

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

26
27
28

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for March 2, 2018 at 8:45 a.m. before the
3

1

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

2

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

3

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

4

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be

5

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

6

order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code

7

1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the

8

intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

9

VII.

10

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

11

than September 18, 2018, and heard on or before October 16, 2018. Non-dispositive motions are

12

heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

13

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.

14

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

15

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

16

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

17

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

18

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

19

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

20

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

21

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

22

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

23

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

24

from the Court’s calendar.

25

Counsel and the plaintiff may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by

26

dialing [phone] and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom

27

Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court

28

days before the noticed hearing date.
4

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than October 30, 2018, and heard no

1
2

later than December 11, 2018, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

3

United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R.

4

Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

5

VIII. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

6

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

7

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

8

to be raised in the motion.

9

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

10

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

11

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

12

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

13

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

14
15

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

16

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

17

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

18

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

19
20

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

21

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

22

IX.

Pre-Trial Conference Date

23

February 5, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

24

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

25

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

26

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].

27
28

Counsel and the plaintiff’s attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of
Practice for the Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre5

1

trial conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the

2

matters set forth in the Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the

3

case to be used by the Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

4

X.

April 2, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

5
6

Trial Date

States District Court Judge.

7

A.

This is a jury trial.1

8

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 2-4 days.

9

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

10

California, Rule 285.

11

XI.

Settlement Conference
The Court does not set a settlement conference at this time. If the parties agree in the future that

12
13

the case is in a settlement posture, they may file a joint request for the Court to set a settlement

14

conference. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference will be

15

conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the Local Rule to be

16

appropriate and in the interests of the parties and the interests of justice and sound case management

17

based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be

18

conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, the joint request for the

19

settlement conference should indicate this preference.

20

XII.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

21

Techniques to Shorten Trial

22

Not applicable at this time.

23

XIII. Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

24
25

XIV. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel and the plaintiff are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of

26
27
28

1

At the hearing, the defendant indicated it waives a jury. However, the plaintiff demanded a jury in his first amended
complaint. (Doc. 1 at 10)

6

1

Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep

2

abreast of any amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to

3

efficiently handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules

4

as provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern

5

District of California.

6

XV.

7

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

8

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

9

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

10

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

11

subsequent status conference.

12

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

13

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

14

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

15

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

16

for granting the relief requested.

17

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 18, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7