Pasillas, et al. v. State of California, et al.

Filing 59

Stipulation for dismissal as to Defendants Correctional Officers Boone and Vasquez; Order Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/27/2018. Correctional Officer Boone and Correctional Officer Vasquez terminated.. (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4

THE SEHAT LAW FIRM, P.L.C.
Cameron Sehat, Esq. (SBN: 256535)
18881 Von Karman Ave., Suite 850
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

5
6
7

Attorney for Plaintiffs: Silvia P. Valdez
and Abelardo Pasillas, individually and as
successors-of-interest on behalf of Omar Pasillas

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13
14
15

SILVIA P. VALDEZ, individually and
as successor-of- interest on behalf of
Omar Pasillas; ABELARDO
PASILLAS, individually and as
successor-of- interest on behalf of
Omar Pasillas;

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-00712-DAD-EPG
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AS
TO DEFENDANTS CORRECTIONAL
OFFICERS BOONE AND VASQUEZ;
ORDER THEREON

Plaintiffs,
v.

(ECF No. 58)

R.N. N.J. MILBURN, an individual;
LPT BRADY; an individual; R.N.
BUCARO; an individual; DR.
SAVAGE, an individual;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOONE,
an individual; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER VASQUEZ, an individual,
and DOES 7 through 10
Defendants

24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs SILVIA P. VALDEZ and

2

ABELARDO PASILLAS and Defendants, R.N. N.J. MILBURN, LPT BRADY, R.N. BUCARO and

3

DR. SAVAGE who have appeared in this action, through their undersigned counsel, that the entire

4

action be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOONE and

5

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VASQUEZ pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii).

6

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT the Court shall direct the clerk to enter an order

7

dismissing the entire action without prejudice as to Defendants CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

8

BOONE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VASQUEZ.

9

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s

10

fees as to the litigation surrounding Defendants CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOONE and

11

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VASQUEZ.

12
Respectfully submitted,

13
14

DATED: June 27, 2018

R. LAWRENCE BRAGG,, Acting Supervising
Deputy Attorney General

15
16

/s/ Lawrence Bragg
Attorneys for Defendants R.N. N.J.
MILBURN, LPT BRADY and R.N. BUCARO

17
18
19
20

THE SEHAT LAW FIRM, PLC

DATED: June 27, 2018

/s/ Cameron Sehat
CAMERON SEHAT
Attorney for Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP

DATED: June 27, 2018

25

/s/ Susan Coleman
SUSAN COLEMAN
Attorney for Defendant Dr. SAVAGE

26
27
28
29
30
31

2

1
2

I attest that counsel R. LAWRENCE BRAGG and Susan Coleman have read and approved this
document, and given consent to the filing of the same with the Court.

3
4

THE SEHAT LAW FIRM, PLC

DATED: June 27, 2018

By: /s/ Cameron Sehat
Attorney for Plaintiffs

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

3

1

ORDER

2

On June 26, 2018, Plaintiffs and Defendants filed a stipulation to dismiss Correctional

3

Officer Boone and Correctional Officer Vasquez without prejudice (ECF No. 58). In light of the

4

stipulation, all claims against Correctional Officer Boone and Correctional Officer Vasquez are

5

dismissed without prejudice, and the action is automatically terminated as to Correctional Officer

6

Boone and Correctional Officer Vasquez. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San

7

Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate

8

the case as to Correctional Officer Boone and Correctional Officer Vasquez.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 27, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

4