Tamra Camp v. County of Kern et al

Filing 17

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/22/2017. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 11/20/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 9/15/2017; Non-Expert 10/26/2018; Expert 1/8/2019. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 4/23/2018 at 08:45 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/22/2019; Hearing by 2/19/2019. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/5/2019; Hearing by 4/16/2019. Settlement Conference set for 5/3/2019 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 6/11/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 8/6/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

TAMRA CAMP,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 17-CV-00715 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 11/20/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 9/15/2017
Non-Expert: 10/26/2018
Expert: 1/8/2019
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
4/23/2018 at 8:45 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/22/2019
Hearing: 2/19/2019

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/5/2019
Hearing: 4/16/2019

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
5/3/2019 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

23
24

26

Pre-Trial Conference:
6/11/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

27

Trial:

25

28
1

8/6/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 5-7 days

1

I.

August 22, 2017.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Miguel Flores appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Marshall Fontes appeared on behalf of the County of Kern, Kern County Probation Department,

6

and David M. Kuge.
James Weakley appeared on behalf of Reyes Soberon.

7
8
9
10

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing
Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

11

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

12

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

13

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

14

continued date.

15

The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

16

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

17

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

18

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

19

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

20

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.

21

The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

22

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

23

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

24

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

25

District of California.

26

Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

27

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

28

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
2

1

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

2

IV.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

3
4

motion to amend, no later than November 20, 2017.

5

V.

6
7
8
9
10

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before September 15, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
October 26, 2018 and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before January 8, 2019.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before November 9,

11

2018, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before December 7, 2018. The written designation of

12

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

13

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

14

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

15

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

16

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

17

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

18

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

19

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

20
21
22

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for April 23, 2018 at 8:45 a.m. before the

23

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

24

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

25

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

26

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be

27
28

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.

3

1

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

2

order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code

3

1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the

4

intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

5

VI.

6

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

7

than January 22, 2019, and heard on or before February 19, 2019. Non-dispositive motions are heard

8

before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

9

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.

10

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

11

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

12

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

13

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

14

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

15

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

16

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

17

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

18

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

19

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

20

from the Court’s calendar.

21

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-

22

8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk

23

receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the

24

noticed hearing date.

25

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than March 5, 2019 and heard no later

26

than April 16, 2019, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

27

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

28

and Local Rules 230 and 260.
4

1

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

2

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

3

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

4

to be raised in the motion.

5

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

6

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

7

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

8

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

9

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

10
11

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

12

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

13

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

14

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

15
16

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

17

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

18

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

19

June 11, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

20

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

21

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

22

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

23
24

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

25

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

26

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

27

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

28

///
5

1

IX.

August 6, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

2
3

Trial Date

States District Court Judge.

4

A.

This is a jury trial.

5

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-7 days.

6

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

7

California, Rule 285.

8

X.

9

Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. May 3, 2019 at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

10

California. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference will be

11

conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the Local Rule to be

12

appropriate and in the interests of the parties and the interests of justice and sound case management

13

based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be

14

conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, the joint request for the

15

settlement conference should indicate this preference.

16

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

17

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

18

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

19

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

20

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

21
22

At least 21days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand, which includes a

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

6

1

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than fourteen days

2

before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of

3

the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

4

settlement is appropriate.
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

5
6

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

7

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

8

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

9
10

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

11

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

12

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

13

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

14

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

15

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

16

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

17

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

18

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

19

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

20

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

21

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

22

E.

The relief sought.

23

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

24
25

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

26

Techniques to Shorten Trial

27

Not applicable at this time.

28

///
7

1
2
3
4

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

5

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

6

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

7

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided

8

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

9

California.

10
11

XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

12

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

13

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

14

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

15

subsequent status conference.

16

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

17

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

18

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

19

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

20

for granting the relief requested.

21

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 22, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
8