Rhey v. Ogbuehi et al
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Order Requiring U.S. Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint, as Premature signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/18/2017. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:17-cv-00718-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ORDER REQUIRING U.S. MARSHAL
TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT,
INFEOMA OGBUEHI, et al.,
[ECF No. 17]
Plaintiff Choon Rhey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights matter
18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring the U.S. Marshal to
20 serve the summons and complaint in this action, filed on October 16, 2017. (ECF No. 17.)
21 Plaintiff paid the filing fee in this matter on August 10, 2017.
Plaintiff’s motion is premature, and shall be denied without prejudice. The Court is
23 required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity
24 or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court will direct
25 service of process only after Plaintiff’s complaint has been screened and found to state
26 cognizable claims for relief. If Plaintiff’s complaint is found to have stated a cognizable claim
27 against any defendant, a copy of the complaint will be sent to Plaintiff with service documents
28 and instructions on how to proceed. No motion will be necessary.
In this case, on September 21, 2017, Plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed, with
2 leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed a first amended complaint concurrently with the instant
3 motion. Plaintiff is advised that his first amended complaint will be screened in due course.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring the
5 U.S. Marshal to serve the summons and complaint (ECF No. 17), is DENIED without prejudice,
6 as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 18, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?