Jason Allan Singer v. Matthew Braman et al
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Redesignate Case From a Prisoner Civil Rights Case to a Non-Prisoner Civil Rights Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/26/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JASON ALLAN SINGER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW BRAMAN, et al.,
15
Case No. 1:17-cv-00725-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO REDESIGNATE CASE
FROM A PRISONER CIVIL
RIGHTS CASE TO A NONPRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS CASE
Defendants.
16
17
On May 18, 2017, plaintiff Jason Singer (APlaintiff@) filed the complaint which
18
commenced this action in the Central District of California. (ECF No. 1). On May 23, 2017,
19
this case was transferred to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 4). The Clerk of Court
20
designated the action as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Nature of Suit: 550
21
Prisoner: Civil Rights.
22
This case relates to an incident that occurred before Plaintiff was in prison. (ECF No.
23
1). Accordingly, the court hereby construes the case as a non-prisoner civil rights action
24
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Therefore, the Clerk of the Court shall change the designation of
25
the present case to reflect that of a non-prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
26
1983, with Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other.
27
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to change the designation of the present
1
1
case to reflect that of a non-prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
2
1983, with Nature of Suit 440; and
3
2.
4
The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the new designation on the Court’s docket
and issue the appropriate notice.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 26, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?