Herrera-Garcia v. Sheryll

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING Case without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/22/2018. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL HERRERA-GARCIA, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:17-cv-00735-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE SHERYLL, Defendant. 16 17 Manuel Herrera-Garcia is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for 20 the Eastern District of California. 21 On November 27, 2017, the court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and 22 recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied 23 without prejudice. (Doc. No. 13.) Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400 filing fee in full within 24 thirty days of the date of issuance of that order, or to submit a renewed application to proceed in 25 forma pauperis clarifying plaintiff’s financial condition and adequately demonstrating financial 26 hardship. (Id. at 2.) 27 28 Far more than thirty days have passed following the issuance of the November 27, 2017 order, and plaintiff has failed to pay the required $400 filing fee or submit a renewed application 1 1 to proceed in forma pauperis. 2 Accordingly: 3 4 5 6 7 1. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the required $400 filing fee or submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 22, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?