Herrera-Garcia v. Sheryll
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING Case without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/22/2018. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MANUEL HERRERA-GARCIA,
12
13
14
15
No. 1:17-cv-00735-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING
FEE
SHERYLL,
Defendant.
16
17
Manuel Herrera-Garcia is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for
20
the Eastern District of California.
21
On November 27, 2017, the court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and
22
recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied
23
without prejudice. (Doc. No. 13.) Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400 filing fee in full within
24
thirty days of the date of issuance of that order, or to submit a renewed application to proceed in
25
forma pauperis clarifying plaintiff’s financial condition and adequately demonstrating financial
26
hardship. (Id. at 2.)
27
28
Far more than thirty days have passed following the issuance of the November 27, 2017
order, and plaintiff has failed to pay the required $400 filing fee or submit a renewed application
1
1
to proceed in forma pauperis.
2
Accordingly:
3
4
5
6
7
1. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the required $400
filing fee or submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 22, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?