Herrera-Garcia v. Sheryll
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that this Action be Dismissed, without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/02/017. Referred to Judge Drozd. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:17-cv-00735-DAD-EPG (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
Manuel Herrera-Garcia (“Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 31, 2017, the Court issued an order giving Plaintiff forty-five days to either pay
the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 7).
Plaintiff was warned that his case would be dismissed if he did not pay the filing fee or submit
an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id.). The time period has expired, and Plaintiff
did not pay the filing fee, submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise
respond to the Court’s order.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
1. This action be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff=s failure to pay the filing
fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis; and
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.
The Court notes that before this case was transferred to the Eastern District of California, the Clerk of
Court at the Northern District of California sent Plaintiff a notice, notifying Plaintiff that his case would be
dismissed if he did not pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3). It does
not appear that Plaintiff responded to the notice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within twenty-
one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file
written objections with the court.
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v.
Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394
(9th Cir. 1991)).
Such a document should be captioned "Objections to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 2, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?