Sienze v. Madera County Sheriff's Office, et al.

Filing 124

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT BINDERS (Docs. 113 and 121) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/28/2019. (Gonzales, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 VICTOR M. SIENZE, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff CASE NO. 1:17-CV-0736 AWI SAB ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT BINDERS v. SHERIFF’S DEPUTY MATTHEW J. KUTZ and SHERIFF’S SERGEANT DANIEL N. KERBER, (Docs. 113 and 121) 13 Defendants 14 15 In this case, both sides have objected to the other’s preparation of trial exhibit binders. See 16 Docs. 113 and 121. The Pretrial Order required the parties to meet to pre-mark and examine each 17 other’s exhibits by February 6, 2019. Doc. 72, 20:9-13. The parties met on February 5, 2019. The 18 parties were unable to come to a mutually agreeable way to mark their exhibits. Each side then 19 submitted their own exhibit binders. While Defendants were not provided a copy of Plaintiff’s 20 exhibit binder, Defendants were able to review the binder a few days before trial. Each side has 21 had an opportunity to object to the other’s exhibits before the presentation of evidence in this case. 22 All issues with the exhibit binders have been resolved and no sanctions are necessary. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2019 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?