Sienze v. Madera County Sheriff's Office, et al.
Filing
124
ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT BINDERS (Docs. 113 and 121) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/28/2019. (Gonzales, V)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
VICTOR M. SIENZE,
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-0736 AWI SAB
ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO
EXHIBIT BINDERS
v.
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY MATTHEW J.
KUTZ and SHERIFF’S SERGEANT
DANIEL N. KERBER,
(Docs. 113 and 121)
13
Defendants
14
15
In this case, both sides have objected to the other’s preparation of trial exhibit binders. See
16
Docs. 113 and 121. The Pretrial Order required the parties to meet to pre-mark and examine each
17
other’s exhibits by February 6, 2019. Doc. 72, 20:9-13. The parties met on February 5, 2019. The
18
parties were unable to come to a mutually agreeable way to mark their exhibits. Each side then
19
submitted their own exhibit binders. While Defendants were not provided a copy of Plaintiff’s
20
exhibit binder, Defendants were able to review the binder a few days before trial. Each side has
21
had an opportunity to object to the other’s exhibits before the presentation of evidence in this case.
22
All issues with the exhibit binders have been resolved and no sanctions are necessary.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2019
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?