Lawton v. Muniz
Filing
17
ORDER REOPENING CASE and ORDER Amending Instructions Concerning Lifting of Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/2/2018. CASE STAYED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Case No. 1:17-cv-00737 MJS (HC)
CHARLES LAWTON,
ORDER REOPENING CASE
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
ORDER AMENDING INSTRUCTIONS
CONCERNING LIFTING OF STAY
(ECF No. 16)
14
15
WILLIAM MUNIZ,
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
19
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 29, 2017, this Court granted
20
Petitioner’s motion to stay this case pending exhaustion of five additional claims in state
21
court pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1070-71 (9th Cir. 2003). (ECF No. 16.)
22
In that Order, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case.
23
(Id.)
24
25
26
27
28
Based upon a re-review of applicable administrative procedures, the undersigned
issues the following amendment of and to that Order:
While the Kelly stay will remain in place, the Court hereby VACATES the direction
to the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
1.
The Clerk of Court reopen this case;
2
2.
The case shall remain stayed pursuant to the December 29, 2017 Order
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(ECF No. 16);
3.
Petitioner shall file a status report every ninety days detailing his progress
in exhausting his unexhausted claims in the state courts.
4.
Petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay within 30 days of the California
Supreme Court issuing a final order resolving Petitioner's unexhausted claims; and
5.
Petitioner shall file an amended habeas petition containing all claims,
including newly exhausted claims, with his motion to lift the stay.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 2, 2018
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?