Lawton v. Muniz

Filing 17

ORDER REOPENING CASE and ORDER Amending Instructions Concerning Lifting of Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/2/2018. CASE STAYED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Case No. 1:17-cv-00737 MJS (HC) CHARLES LAWTON, ORDER REOPENING CASE Petitioner, 12 v. 13 ORDER AMENDING INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LIFTING OF STAY (ECF No. 16) 14 15 WILLIAM MUNIZ, Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 29, 2017, this Court granted 20 Petitioner’s motion to stay this case pending exhaustion of five additional claims in state 21 court pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1070-71 (9th Cir. 2003). (ECF No. 16.) 22 In that Order, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case. 23 (Id.) 24 25 26 27 28 Based upon a re-review of applicable administrative procedures, the undersigned issues the following amendment of and to that Order: While the Kelly stay will remain in place, the Court hereby VACATES the direction to the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The Clerk of Court reopen this case; 2 2. The case shall remain stayed pursuant to the December 29, 2017 Order 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (ECF No. 16); 3. Petitioner shall file a status report every ninety days detailing his progress in exhausting his unexhausted claims in the state courts. 4. Petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay within 30 days of the California Supreme Court issuing a final order resolving Petitioner's unexhausted claims; and 5. Petitioner shall file an amended habeas petition containing all claims, including newly exhausted claims, with his motion to lift the stay. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 2, 2018 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?