Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. Franco et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/30/2017 is CONTINUED to 2/23/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/23/2017. (Bernacchi, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MARGARET E. DALTON (SB #241033) maggie.dalton@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 33 South Sixth Street Suite 4200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 373-8858 Facsimile: (612) 373-8881 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Land O’Lakes, Inc. 10 JAN L. KAHN (SB #55788) JOSH T. FOX (SB #282072 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP 219 North Douty Street Hanford, CA 93230 Telephone: (559) 584-3337 Facsimile: (559) 584-3348 11 Attorneys for All Defendants 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 FRESNO DIVISION 15 Land O’Lakes, Inc., Case No. 1:17-CV-00749-DAD-MJS 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 Jose D. Franco, Rose Franco, Richard Franco, and Joseph Franco, 20 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Defendants. 21 22 The above matter came before the undersigned upon the parties’ Joint Motion To Amend 23 Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference. Based upon all of the files, records, and 24 proceedings herein, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: Defendants’ Joint Motion To Amend Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference is 25 26 GRANTED. The 27 28 S TOE L R IVES LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MINNEA PO LI S ORDER 94468033.1 0039116-00139 mandatory scheduling conference is reset for 1 February 23, 2018 at 10:00 am. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: October 23, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOE L R IVES LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MINNEA PO LI S ORDER 94468033.1 0039116-00139 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?