Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. Franco et al
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/30/2017 is CONTINUED to 2/23/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/23/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
1
2
3
4
MARGARET E. DALTON (SB #241033)
maggie.dalton@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
33 South Sixth Street
Suite 4200
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 373-8858
Facsimile: (612) 373-8881
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Land O’Lakes, Inc.
10
JAN L. KAHN (SB #55788)
JOSH T. FOX (SB #282072
KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP
219 North Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Telephone: (559) 584-3337
Facsimile: (559) 584-3348
11
Attorneys for All Defendants
8
9
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
FRESNO DIVISION
15
Land O’Lakes, Inc.,
Case No. 1:17-CV-00749-DAD-MJS
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
Jose D. Franco, Rose Franco, Richard Franco,
and Joseph Franco,
20
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
TO AMEND ORDER SETTING
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
21
22
The above matter came before the undersigned upon the parties’ Joint Motion To Amend
23
Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference. Based upon all of the files, records, and
24
proceedings herein, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
Defendants’ Joint Motion To Amend Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference is
25
26
GRANTED.
The
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MINNEA PO LI S
ORDER
94468033.1 0039116-00139
mandatory
scheduling
conference
is
reset
for
1
February 23, 2018 at 10:00 am.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
October 23, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MINNEA PO LI S
ORDER
94468033.1 0039116-00139
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?