Shepard v. Podsakoff et al
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING Action without prejudice for failure to pay filing fee and failure to obey Court Order, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 09/18/17. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
LAMONT SHEPARD,
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00754-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING
FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDER
M. PODSAKOFF, et al.,
(ECF No. 7)
Defendants.
13
14
Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
15
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 2, 2017. (ECF
16
No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C.
17
§ 1915. (ECF No. 2.)
18
On June 7, 2017, the Court issued findings and recommendations recommending that
19
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the
20
$400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff did not file
21
objections. On August 9, 2017, the assigned District Judge issued an order adopting the findings
22
and recommendations and ordering Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full within twenty-
23
one (21) days. (ECF No. 7). In that order, Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to pay the filing
24
fee within the specified time, the action would be dismissed. (Id. at 2.) More than thirty days
25
have passed, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee.
26
Because Plaintiff has failed to obey the Court’s order and pay the appropriate filing fee,
27
this case cannot proceed. This matter will be dismissed See id.; Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d
28
1258, 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992).
1
1
ORDER
2
Based on the foregoing, this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, without prejudice, for
3
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order of August 9, 2017, (ECF No. 7), and his
4
failure to pay the filing fee.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 18, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?