Johnson, Jr. v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDERED this case to be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/11/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AYLWIN JOHNSON, JR.,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00755-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
(ECF NOS. 8, 11, & 23)
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Aylwin Johnson, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
14
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a
15
United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
16
On December 15, 2017, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and
17
recommendations, recommending that all claims and defendants, except for Plaintiff’s claims
18
against defendants Dr. Ho, R.N. Larranaga, California Forensic Medical Group, Stanislaus
19
County, and Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department for deliberate indifference to serious
20
medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF
21
No. 23, p. 13).
22
23
The parties were provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
recommendations within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
26
the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
27
analysis.
28
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on December 15,
2
2017, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
3
2. All claims and defendants, except for Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Dr. Ho,
4
R.N. Larranaga, California Forensic Medical Group, Stanislaus County, and
5
Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department for deliberate indifference to serious
6
medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, are DISMISSED without
7
prejudice; and
8
3. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
January 11, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?