Stratford v. Brazelton, et al.
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Comply with a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/19/2020. Show Cause Response due within 30 days. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ERIC STRATFORD,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
Case No. 1:17-cv-00766-JDP
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
v.
PAUL D. BRAZELTON, et al.,
Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
14
15
Plaintiff Eric Stratford is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil
16
rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on October
17
15, 2019, and plaintiff was ordered to respond within thirty days. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff,
18
however, has filed neither a response to the screening order nor a first amended complaint.
19
To manage our docket effectively, we impose deadlines and require litigants to meet
20
those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court may
21
dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres.
22
Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he consensus among our
23
sister circuits, with which we agree, is that courts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at
24
least under certain circumstances.”). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but the court has
25
a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See
26
Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.
27
We will give plaintiff the opportunity to explain why the court should not dismiss his
28
1
1
case for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this order will constitute another
2
failure to comply with a court order and will result in dismissal of this case. Accordingly,
3
plaintiff must show cause within thirty days of the date of entry of this order why the court
4
should not dismiss his case for failure to prosecute.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
March 19, 2020
8
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
No. 205.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?