Knapp v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

Stipulation for extension of time; Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/16/2018. (Opening Brief Deadline: 5/25/2018) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 KELSEY BROWN, CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1003 Whitman Street Tacoma, WA 98406 (206) 300-9063 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRENSO DIVISION 11 12 KRISTOPHER KNAPP, 13 14 Plaintiff, Case # 1:17−CV−00773−AWI-EPG vs. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER 15 16 NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 18 19 20 Defendant. The parties hereby stipulate by counsel and in accordance with the scheduling order Plaintiff shall have an extension of time to file Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. Plaintiff’s counsel as 21 22 23 24 just taken this case on and needs time to review the entire record and draft the opening brief. Parties stipulate to a 45-day extension. Opening Brief shall now be due on May 25, 2018. The parties stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 25 26 27 28 DATED: April 11, 2018. /s/ Kelsey Brown KELSEY BROWN CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1 1003 Whitman Street Tacoma, WA 98406 (206) 300-9063 1 2 3 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 7 8 Dated April 11, 2018: s/ KELSEY M. BROWN for Tina Niacker TINA NIACKER (per e-mail authorization) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Of Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 ORDER The Court adopts the parties’ stipulation as outlined above. Plaintiff’s Opening brief shall be due on May 25, 2018. The Court’s Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 3), is modified accordingly. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: April 16, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?