Hughes v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING 7 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/11/2017. (1. The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is continued to 9/6/2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Cou rtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd; 2. The initial scheduling conference, currently set for 8/14/2017, is vacated; and 3. Within seven days of this order, the parties are directed to contact Mamie Hernandez, Courtroom Deputy to Magistrate Judge Stanely A. Boone, at mhernandez@caed.uscourts.gov or (559) 499-5672, to re-schedule the initial scheduling conference.) (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRENDA HUGHES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 1:17-cv-00779-DAD-SAB
v.
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
(Doc. No. 7)
Defendant.
16
17
On July 11, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that the court continue the
18
19
hearing on defendant’s pending motion to dismiss (see Doc. No. 5). Good cause having been
20
shown and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation:
21
1. The hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is continued to September
22
6, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd;
23
2. The initial scheduling conference, currently set for August 14, 2017, is vacated; and
24
3. Within seven days of this order, the parties are directed to contact Mamie Hernandez,
Courtroom Deputy to Magistrate Judge Stanely A. Boone, at
25
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
mhernandez @caed.uscourts.gov or (559) 499-5672, to re-schedule the initial
2
scheduling conference.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 11, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?