Trujillo v. Carter's Retail, Inc. et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017. FURTHER ORDERED that Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued 9/19/2017 to October 11, 2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/14/2017. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Myra B. Villamor (SBN 232912)
[e-mail]
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90067-3021
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CARTER’S RETAIL, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE TRUJILLO
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

CARTER’S RETAIL, INC. dba
CARTER’S; GARRISON TULARE LLC;

15

Case No. 17-cv-00787-LJO-BAM
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

Defendants.

16
17
Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”)

18
19

and Defendant Carter’s Retail, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective

20

counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 21-day extension of time in which to

21

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant

22

shall be due on or before September 4, 2017.

23

This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order.

24

The reason for the present extension is that the parties are in the midst of

25

negotiating a resolution of this matter.

26

///

27

///

28

///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
40357398v.1

1
2

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of
this document on his behalf.

3
4

DATED: August 10, 2017

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

5
6

By: /s/ Myra B. Villamor
Myra B. Villamor
Attorneys for Defendant
Carter’s Retail, Inc.

7
8
9

DATED: August 10, 2017

MISSION LAW FIRM

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following

3

deadline applies: a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017.

4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from

6

September 19, 2017 to October 11, 2017 at 9:00AM before Judge McAuliffe in

7

Courtroom 8.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 14, 2017

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE