Trujillo v. Carter's Retail, Inc. et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017. FURTHER ORDERED that Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued 9/19/2017 to October 11, 2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/14/2017. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Myra B. Villamor (SBN 232912) mvillamor@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 Attorneys for Defendant CARTER’S RETAIL, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE TRUJILLO Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 CARTER’S RETAIL, INC. dba CARTER’S; GARRISON TULARE LLC; 15 Case No. 17-cv-00787-LJO-BAM STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) 18 19 and Defendant Carter’s Retail, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective 20 counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 21-day extension of time in which to 21 respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant 22 shall be due on or before September 4, 2017. 23 This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order. 24 The reason for the present extension is that the parties are in the midst of 25 negotiating a resolution of this matter. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 40357398v.1 1 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this document on his behalf. 3 4 DATED: August 10, 2017 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 5 6 By: /s/ Myra B. Villamor Myra B. Villamor Attorneys for Defendant Carter’s Retail, Inc. 7 8 9 DATED: August 10, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following 3 deadline applies: a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017. 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from 6 September 19, 2017 to October 11, 2017 at 9:00AM before Judge McAuliffe in 7 Courtroom 8. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?