Alexander v. Ybarra et al

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING, Without Prejudice, Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/26/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DARRION LARRY ALEXANDER, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. G. YBARRA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-00804-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS [ECF No. 18] 13 Plaintiff Darrion Larry Alexander is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 14 15 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of summons, filed January 23, 16 17 2018. Plaintiff’s motion must be denied as premature. Plaintiff’s motion must be denied as premature. As Plaintiff was advised in the Court’s First Informational Order, discovery in this action does 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 not open until after Defendants’ file an answer to the complaint and no discovery may be initiated until the Court issues a discovery order or otherwise orders that discovery begin. (ECF No. 5, Order at 4.) On January 8, 2018, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of signature and directed that an amended complaint be filed within thirty days. Therefore, no Defendant has yet been served and the Court has not issued the necessary discovery order. Moreover, Plaintiff is reminded that discovery matters are to be conducted between the parties and, absent a need for /// /// /// /// 1 1 intervention, should not be served on the Court. (Id.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for discovery is 2 denied, without prejudice, as premature. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 January 26, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?