E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Instituut Voor Landbouw - En Visserijonderzoek, et al.

Filing 33

ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Terminate Defendant Flanders Food signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/8/2017. (Jessen, A)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

5
6
7

v.
INSTITUUT VOOR LANDBOUW - EN
VISSERIJONDERZOEK, et al.,

Case No. 1:17-cv-00808-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT
FLANDERS FOOD
(ECF No. 30)

8
Defendants.
9
10

On November 8, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation voluntary dismissal of Defendant

11

Flanders Food without prejudice. (ECF No. 30). Thus, the claims against Defendant Flanders

12

Food have been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111

13

F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493,

14

1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may

15

terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

16
17

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Flanders Food
on the docket.

18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20

Dated:

November 8, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1